Are you a “cash” only person (like Dave Ramsey) or do you prefer to utilize debt on your behalf?
Honestly, I see the pros and cons to both sides. Being more financially risk averse/conservative, I get the appeal of only using “cash” (or, even if I’m putting it on a debit/credit card, only buying what I can afford to pay at that very moment). It’s a safer position from the standpoint that you aren’t going to get yourself into massive debt. This strategy makes a ton of sense for those trying to minimize spending on things they don’t need (mostly consumer products that contribute to lifestyle creep).
But if you leverage debt to buy assets (like real estate), where someone else is paying the loan down for you, you can scale much more quickly.
Imagine wanting to buy a rental property. Let’s say you’re looking to buy a single family home for $120,000. If you have to pay cash for it, it will take you a long time to save up $120k. Even if you’re investing it, unless it’s in a self-directed IRA, when you pull your money out to purchase the property you’ll get hit with taxes. But if you only had to save up $30k (for a 25% down payment on an investment property) or even $4,200 (for a 3.5% FHA loan, where you have to live in the property for at least one year), you can get started much sooner.
Leverage works both ways. It can help propel you to success or drive you into the ground. But as long as you’re taking on appropriate risks (preferably starting small unless you have a ton of experience and expertise in what you’re investing in), you can build wealth at a greater pace by leveraging debt as opposed to paying all “cash” for everything.
What are your thoughts/how do you prefer to invest?